Comments on: A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/ Your Thoughts, Everyone's Wisdom Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:14:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence | Urban Philosophy | Fr. Griggs http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-10515 A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence | Urban Philosophy | Fr. Griggs Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:22:29 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-10515 [...] via A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence | Urban Philosophy. [...] [...] via A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence | Urban Philosophy. [...]

]]> By: Mitchell LeBlanc and a Disproof of God |:| The Aristophrenium http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-1199 Mitchell LeBlanc and a Disproof of God |:| The Aristophrenium Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:22:53 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-1199 [...] in December of 2009, Mitchell LeBlanc of UrbanPhilosophy.net composed what he thought to be a possible disproof of the existence of God. The following day I had posted a rebuttal in response to his disproof. Given the exquisitely [...] [...] in December of 2009, Mitchell LeBlanc of UrbanPhilosophy.net composed what he thought to be a possible disproof of the existence of God. The following day I had posted a rebuttal in response to his disproof. Given the exquisitely [...]

]]> By: noen http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-1059 noen Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:48:47 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-1059 I likewise do not see how the 4's follow from the 3's. What this is saying is "Can God who is omniscient, make himself non-omniscient?" I suppose we could shorten that to "Can God die?" I suppose he could but then he wouldn't be a god. The whole exercise is silly. I likewise do not see how the 4's follow from the 3's. What this is saying is "Can God who is omniscient, make himself non-omniscient?" I suppose we could shorten that to "Can God die?" I suppose he could but then he wouldn't be a god.

The whole exercise is silly.

]]> By: noen http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-10034 noen Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:48:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-10034 I likewise do not see how the 4's follow from the 3's. What this is saying is "Can God who is omniscient, make himself non-omniscient?" I suppose we could shorten that to "Can God die?" I suppose he could but then he wouldn't be a god. The whole exercise is silly. I likewise do not see how the 4's follow from the 3's. What this is saying is "Can God who is omniscient, make himself non-omniscient?" I suppose we could shorten that to "Can God die?" I suppose he could but then he wouldn't be a god.

The whole exercise is silly.

]]> By: noen http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-1058 noen Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:40:42 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-1058 So Spinoza was an atheist? No, I don't think so. You are confused. So Spinoza was an atheist? No, I don't think so. You are confused.

]]> By: noen http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-10033 noen Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:40:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-10033 So Spinoza was an atheist? No, I don't think so. You are confused. So Spinoza was an atheist? No, I don't think so. You are confused.

]]> By: noen http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-1057 noen Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:32:40 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-1057 Don't you do any philosophy around here or is it all hermeneutics? Don't you do any philosophy around here or is it all hermeneutics?

]]> By: noen http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-10032 noen Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:32:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-10032 Don't you do any philosophy around here or is it all hermeneutics? Don't you do any philosophy around here or is it all hermeneutics?

]]> By: A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence: Defeated | Urban Philosophy http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-1054 A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence: Defeated | Urban Philosophy Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:27:33 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-1054 [...] I authored an article entitled “A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence.” There were then two more installments as replies to Ryft and Bolt. In this article I will [...] [...] I authored an article entitled “A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence.” There were then two more installments as replies to Ryft and Bolt. In this article I will [...]

]]> By: MitchLeBlanc http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-disproof-of-gods-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-1039 MitchLeBlanc Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:23:18 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=824#comment-1039 Hello Morgan, I think that the task is still upon philosophers of religion to outline definitions of God's attributes which aren't in conflict. I find this specific argument resolved by Weilenberg's definition of Omnipotence (as expanded on by Brian Leftow) but I've not examined it further for complications. Hello Morgan,

I think that the task is still upon philosophers of religion to outline definitions of God's attributes which aren't in conflict. I find this specific argument resolved by Weilenberg's definition of Omnipotence (as expanded on by Brian Leftow) but I've not examined it further for complications.

]]>