Comments on: Ryft on “A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence”

By: Ryft on “A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence” | Urban Philosophy « Griggs the Skeptic

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:29:53 +0000

[...] via Ryft on “A Possible Disproof of God’s Existence” | Urban Philosophy. [...]

By: MitchLeBlanc

MitchLeBlanc — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:17:19 +0000

Thanks Josh! I checked that out shorty thereafter and later went on to read Weilenberg's paper on the topic. I wrote a later article saying that given the modified definitions, the argument fails. See:http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/a-possible-... Thanks for commenting!

By: MitchLeBlanc

MitchLeBlanc — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:17:19 +0000

By: MitchLeBlanc

MitchLeBlanc — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:17:00 +0000

By: MitchLeBlanc

MitchLeBlanc — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:17:00 +0000

By: Payton

Payton — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:52:58 +0000

I have no idea why anyone would think Mitch is talking about free will and omnipotence. Where on earth are we getting this idea?

I'm not impressed with the fourth premise, and I'd love to hear Mitch's proof of it. I don't see why it would be true at all.

By: Payton

Payton — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:52:00 +0000

I have no idea why anyone would think Mitch is talking about free will and omnipotence. Where on earth are we getting this idea?

I'm not impressed with the fourth premise, and I'd love to hear Mitch's proof of it. I don't see why it would be true at all.

By: Josh

Josh — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:25:02 +0000

You might want to check out "Maximal Power" by Flint and Fredosso (if you haven't already), as it deals with sort of problem you are raising.http://www.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/mp.htm. (Your argument, btw, is clever; the article I linked will take issue with premise (2).)

By: Josh

Josh — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:25:00 +0000

By: Josh

Josh — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:25:59 +0000

Link without period:http://www.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/mp.htm