<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/</link>
	<description>Your Thoughts, Everyone&#039;s Wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Case Against Presuppositionalism: Part III &#124; Urban Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>The Case Against Presuppositionalism: Part III &#124; Urban Philosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: This post is part of a series which has culminated in a scholarly paper on the topic. As such, I kindly ask that any criticism of the subject matter therein is given with a cognizance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: This post is part of a series which has culminated in a scholarly paper on the topic. As such, I kindly ask that any criticism of the subject matter therein is given with a cognizance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zao Thanatoo’s Response To Mitch LeBlanc Regarding TAG&#160;&#124;&#160;Choosing Hats</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Zao Thanatoo’s Response To Mitch LeBlanc Regarding TAG&#160;&#124;&#160;Choosing Hats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>[...] Original Article by Mitch LeBlanc [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original Article by Mitch LeBlanc [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zao on the Transcendental Argument &#124; Urban Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Zao on the Transcendental Argument &#124; Urban Philosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>[...] blogger who goes by the handle &#8220;ZaoThanatoo&#8221; has offered a response to my paper on the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God. I regret responding to this almost a month after it was posted but I was only made aware of its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogger who goes by the handle &#8220;ZaoThanatoo&#8221; has offered a response to my paper on the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God. I regret responding to this almost a month after it was posted but I was only made aware of its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zao Thanatoo</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Zao Thanatoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://zaothanatoo.blogspot.com/2010/02/considered-response-to-mitchell-leblanc.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://zaothanatoo.blogspot.com/2010/02/considere...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://zaothanatoo.blogspot.com/2010/02/considered-response-to-mitchell-leblanc.html" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://zaothanatoo.blogspot.com/2010/02/considere.." rel="nofollow">http://zaothanatoo.blogspot.com/2010/02/considere..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Response to Bolt on Three Topics &#124; Urban Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>A Response to Bolt on Three Topics &#124; Urban Philosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>[...] touches upon this notion in a paper by referencing presuppositionalist Greg Bahnsen&#8217;s attempt at avoiding having to show [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] touches upon this notion in a paper by referencing presuppositionalist Greg Bahnsen&#8217;s attempt at avoiding having to show [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay Kumar</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>No matter how much we debate or discuss... the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godrealized.org/existence_of_god.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;existence of God&lt;/a&gt; Almighty can never be denied! If we exist... if human beings exist so do God Almighty... the creator of all things cosmic! Why? Every human being primarily is a soul atman on its cosmic journey of 8.4 million manifestations (an earthly life cycle of 96.4 million years)! Every soul atman manifests the human form to work out its karma... remove dross impurities within! 
 
It is only when God Almighty explodes self with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godrealized.com/bigbangtheory.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;big bang&lt;/a&gt;... the whole cosmos gets created! The simple definition of God Almighty is... the cluster of all purified souls atmans in the cosmos at a given moment of time! The sacred Bhagavad Gita of Hinduism is absolutely clear on this point! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how much we debate or discuss&#8230; the <a href="http://www.godrealized.org/existence_of_god.html" target="_blank">existence of God</a> Almighty can never be denied! If we exist&#8230; if human beings exist so do God Almighty&#8230; the creator of all things cosmic! Why? Every human being primarily is a soul atman on its cosmic journey of 8.4 million manifestations (an earthly life cycle of 96.4 million years)! Every soul atman manifests the human form to work out its karma&#8230; remove dross impurities within! </p>
<p>It is only when God Almighty explodes self with a <a href="http://www.godrealized.com/bigbangtheory.html" target="_blank">big bang</a>&#8230; the whole cosmos gets created! The simple definition of God Almighty is&#8230; the cluster of all purified souls atmans in the cosmos at a given moment of time! The sacred Bhagavad Gita of Hinduism is absolutely clear on this point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conversations with a Presuppositionalist &#124; Urban Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Conversations with a Presuppositionalist &#124; Urban Philosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-992</guid>
		<description>[...] integral to my criticism of the TAG and presuppositionalism. The first is my paper entitled, &#8220;The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God.&#8221; My second is a recent post outlining the conventionalist justification of logic entitled, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] integral to my criticism of the TAG and presuppositionalism. The first is my paper entitled, &#8220;The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God.&#8221; My second is a recent post outlining the conventionalist justification of logic entitled, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Conventionalist Justification of Logic &#124; Urban Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>A Conventionalist Justification of Logic &#124; Urban Philosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-977</guid>
		<description>[...] initially posted these set of comments on a post at Choosing Hats but some emails, comments on my article regarding the TAG (those from &#8216;Joshua&#8217;) and other conversations with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] initially posted these set of comments on a post at Choosing Hats but some emails, comments on my article regarding the TAG (those from &#8216;Joshua&#8217;) and other conversations with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MitchLeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>MitchLeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Yes, a Conventionalist justification of logic accounts for the seeming universiality and absoluteness of logical laws. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a Conventionalist justification of logic accounts for the seeming universiality and absoluteness of logical laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/the-transcendental-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=737#comment-766</guid>
		<description>So is this primarily how you account for the preconditions of intelligibilty?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is this primarily how you account for the preconditions of intelligibilty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
