Comments on: Yet Another Response to Bolt on Presuppositionalism http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/ Your Thoughts, Everyone's Wisdom Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:14:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-10537 Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth Sun, 07 Aug 2011 21:55:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-10537  Yes, God'd have to  depend on those laws and the inherent rationality and order and natural laws of Nature such that thus He could not be that Primary Cause. Nature herself through her causes is that! Thus He'd depend on Existence and not contrariwise! Thus, He could not be God!    We ignostics-igtheists find the supernatural just blather ,because it not only does not fit with our conservation of knowledge, as knowledge but is also incoherent.  Yes, God’d have to  depend on those laws and the inherent rationality and order and natural laws of Nature such that thus He could not be that Primary Cause. Nature herself through her causes is that! Thus He’d depend on Existence and not contrariwise! Thus, He could not be God!
   We ignostics-igtheists find the supernatural just blather ,because it not only does not fit with our conservation of knowledge, as knowledge but is also incoherent.

]]> By: Mitchell LeBlanc http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-241 Mitchell LeBlanc Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:56:13 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-241 I shall respond on the forum. I shall respond on the forum.

]]> By: Mitchell LeBlanc http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-9910 Mitchell LeBlanc Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:56:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-9910 I shall respond on the forum. I shall respond on the forum.

]]> By: Vagon http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-240 Vagon Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:40:15 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-240 Mitch, Possibly but I hope not. I'm struggling with semantics perhaps. Maybe I can clarify. Logic is not strictly logical as per the trilemma, unless you account for the fact logic is not absolutely certain there doesn't appear to be an escape. Now if you accept that logic is contextually or systemically certain thats a different thing. Mitch,

Possibly but I hope not. I’m struggling with semantics perhaps.

Maybe I can clarify. Logic is not strictly logical as per the trilemma, unless you account for the fact logic is not absolutely certain there doesn’t appear to be an escape.

Now if you accept that logic is contextually or systemically certain thats a different thing.

]]> By: Vagon http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-9909 Vagon Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:40:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-9909 Mitch, Possibly but I hope not. I'm struggling with semantics perhaps. Maybe I can clarify. Logic is not strictly logical as per the trilemma, unless you account for the fact logic is not absolutely certain there doesn't appear to be an escape. Now if you accept that logic is contextually or systemically certain thats a different thing. Mitch,

Possibly but I hope not. I’m struggling with semantics perhaps.

Maybe I can clarify. Logic is not strictly logical as per the trilemma, unless you account for the fact logic is not absolutely certain there doesn’t appear to be an escape.

Now if you accept that logic is contextually or systemically certain thats a different thing.

]]> By: Vagon http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-239 Vagon Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:33:02 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-239 Write up here: http://www.wearesmrt.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3087 Write up here:
http://www.wearesmrt.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3087

]]> By: Vagon http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-9908 Vagon Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:33:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-9908 Write up here: http://www.wearesmrt.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3087 Write up here:
http://www.wearesmrt.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3087

]]> By: Mitchell LeBlanc http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-238 Mitchell LeBlanc Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:00:38 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-238 I am not clear on what the difference between "100% infallible logic" and other logic would be. Are you conflating the terms "logic", "knowledge", "belief"? I am not clear on what the difference between “100% infallible logic” and other logic would be. Are you conflating the terms “logic”, “knowledge”, “belief”?

]]> By: Mitchell LeBlanc http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-9907 Mitchell LeBlanc Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:00:00 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-9907 I am not clear on what the difference between "100% infallible logic" and other logic would be. Are you conflating the terms "logic", "knowledge", "belief"? I am not clear on what the difference between “100% infallible logic” and other logic would be. Are you conflating the terms “logic”, “knowledge”, “belief”?

]]> By: Vagon http://urbanphilosophy.net/philosophy/yet-another-response-to-bolt-on-presuppositionalism/comment-page-1/#comment-237 Vagon Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:54:07 +0000 http://urbanphilosophy.net/?p=723#comment-237 Mitch, okay I'll see if I can write something up. Mitch, okay I’ll see if I can write something up.

]]>